NP, SC 2/26/1864

From the Daily South Carolinian (Columbia, S. C.)
 
February 26, 1864
 
To the Superintendent and Directors of the South Carolina Railroad
   There are abuses practiced upon the public by your employees having charge of the cars, which it is proper for you to be made acquainted with, in order to have them corrected. The one of which complaint is now made is the injury inflicted upon travelers by the conductors and engineers upon your trains refusing to take in passengers, at the regularly appointed stations, when every sign and intimation is given to them of the desire of the traveler to be taken on board the car. A case of this kind occurred at Fort Motte Station on yesterday, and it is not the first which has taken place there, and is doubtless only a specimen of similar abuses practiced at other places. A traveler, after riding a long distance, arrived at the station and waited several hours the arrival of the cars. As soon as they appeared, he placed himself, with his baggage at the edge of the track, and made the usual signs to the engineer and conductor, and called aloud to them that he desired to get on board. They saw him, but heeded him not, and passed by as though the citizens of the State had no rights in the premises which it was their duty to regard. We know not why were the engineer and conductors on the occasion, but their names can be ascertained, and will be ascertained, if the conduct is not rebuked, and this wrong which they are practicing upon our people be not put a stop to; and we appeal to you, gentlemen, as having the authority to do so. Your company have been endowed with large privileges by the Legislature. They have the authority conferred on them of laying heavy taxes on our people for transportation on your road, which ensures greatly to their profit, and your own private wealth; and this to the exclusion of any other individual or company who may desire to build a road alongside of yours. Think you that this monopoly and these high and valuable privileges were given to you for nothing? Or do you not know that they were conferred on you in consideration of services which your company were to render, looking to the convenience and interest of the public? These constitute your duties to the public and their claims upon your, which the rudeness and caprices of your engineers and conductors cannot forego. After you had appointed your stations for receiving travelers, and invited our people to meet you there, when traveling twelve, twenty or thirty miles to reach the station, what right have your engineers and conductors rudely to pass them by, leaving them to seek their homes again, twelve, twenty, or, perchance, thirty miles, in inclement weather. Indeed, what right have they thus to act in any weather or for any distance? Suppose, when your company applied to the Legislature for a charter, that they had announced to those honorable bodies that they intended to remit the interests and the accommodation of your people to the capricious whims of their conductors and engineers; that it was to be left to them whether a traveler was to be taken on board or to be contemptuously left standing with his baggage on the road-side; think you, gentlemen, that their petition would have been granted? I tell you nay; and nobody knows better than those petitioners that witch such a purpose announced, the representatives of the people would have thrust their petition from their hands. Good faith, then, on the part of the company, calls upon them to interpose promptly, and punish those officials who violate this fair understanding which they have entered into with our citizens. It will not do for those officials to urge the hackneyed excuse that the "cars were behind time." Its not the fault of the traveler, who is at the station at the appointed hour, by invitation of the company, that the company's cars were "behind time." It is his right and their duty to stop and take him on board; especially, too, when this being "behind time" is so often occasioned by time lost through dilatorizing in taking in wood and water, and many other acts of indolence, which frequently detain the cars. In bringing this grievance to the public attention, I desire no notoriety, but merely that it might be corrected, which, gentlemen, I'm persuaded you will promptly do. I, however, avoid no responsibility, and, therefore, leave my name with the printer. In the meantime, understand that I am
One Of The People
 
St. Matthew, February 20, 1864
P. S.  Since writing the above, it has been ascertained that in consequence of the cars not stopping at the Fort Motte Station, only a part of the mail was left at the post office there, and, further, that several passengers who desired to get out of the cars at that depot were not allowed to do so, but carried to Kingsville, and there left to get back to Fort Motte as best they could. On their return there, at a late hour, they found their conveyances had left the depot, and their alternatives were, either to pass the night of severe cold in the comfortless passenger room, or foot their way home, leaving their baggage behind. Surely, a conductor and engineer who will act with such little regard to the rights and comfort of travelers deserve the severest censure of those who have authority over them.

Home